A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Maryland board hears concerns over edTPA rollout, cost and possible impact on teacher pipeline

January 04, 2024 | Maryland Department of Education, School Boards, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Maryland board hears concerns over edTPA rollout, cost and possible impact on teacher pipeline
Chair Kitchen opened the board’s January meeting and framed a statewide conversation about portfolio-based teacher performance assessments, including edTPA and PPAT, that the State Board must implement under law before July 1, 2025. Kelly, a Maryland Department of Education staff member, summarized the department’s recent survey: “As of our last survey… eight institutions [are] using edTPA and four are using the PPAT,” and both products have been adopted by the State Board for this purpose.

Higher-education representatives described how institutions have integrated the assessment into teacher-preparation programs. A Towson University representative said the campus uses an internally set expected score and provides remediation rather than rescoring nationally. Frostburg State University’s speaker said Frostburg has used edTPA more than five years, folded the assessment fee into student costs and helped students access financial aid and waivers during pilot periods. “It is time consuming,” Frostburg’s speaker said, describing the workload for candidates and scorers.

Board members and district leaders raised consistent concerns about costs and downstream effects. Dr. McGee urged the board to explore waivers or other financial supports, noting ETS—one vendor—has offered waivers in pilot phases. A Hartford County superintendent warned that conditional teacher numbers have climbed sharply and said stricter requirements and added costs could increase the pool of conditionally certified teachers, complicating local hiring and budget planning.

The board discussed next steps: staff agreed to request additional data from vendors (including national scoring distributions) and to convene vendors and educator-preparation programs for technical briefings. Members asked colleagues to gather feedback from stakeholder groups, including conditional teachers and higher-education partners, and return with concrete questions and requests for February. Chair Kitchen moved to set the February meeting date to Feb. 8 to allow members to attend a teacher-education summit; the board tentatively penciled Feb. 15 as a snow backup.

The meeting did not set a cut score; Kelly repeated the statutory timeline — that assessments and a cut score are required beginning 07/01/2025 — and staff committed to providing performance data and options for financial supports at a future meeting.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee