A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Riverbank residents tell planning commission Riverwalk would consume prime farmland, increase flood risk

March 19, 2024 | Riverbank, Los Angeles County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Riverbank residents tell planning commission Riverwalk would consume prime farmland, increase flood risk
Several Riverbank residents used the public-comment period at the March 19 Planning Commission meeting to urge commissioners to oppose the Riverwalk proposal and to preserve prime agricultural land.

Karen Conrado of Hoag Road said she opposes the Riverwalk project and asked commissioners to weigh long-term consequences. "Once it's paved over, it'll be gone forever," she said, arguing the site is on a floodplain that would worsen downstream flooding, reduce habitat and wildlife corridors, and raise infrastructure and long-term maintenance costs for residents.

Fred Walton of Modesto told commissioners the river bottom is better suited to parkland or low-density lots than compact, high-density housing. He urged commissioners to visit the river bottom and bluffs before making a recommendation and said preserving greenbelt near the river would better serve the community.

Milt Treweiler, a lifetime Stanislaus County resident, framed prime farmland as an "irreplaceable" legacy resource for future generations and called for building up through infill and midrise development rather than expanding into farmland. "Save our farmland for our descendants," he said.

Staff did not present a Riverwalk agenda item for action during this meeting; in staff comments later in the meeting, staff confirmed the Riverwalk environmental impact report's comment period had been extended and that materials were being converted to Spanish for public access. Commissioners did not vote on Riverwalk at this meeting.

The public remarks raised three recurring concerns: loss of productive farmland, increased flood risk and infrastructure costs, and a preference for infill development rather than expansion onto agricultural land. Speakers also criticized gated communities and clustering that they said could reduce social interaction.

Next steps: commissioners did not take formal action on Riverwalk at this session; staff noted the EIR process is ongoing and public comments will be accepted during the extended comment period.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee