Loomis council directs staff to pursue regional solid‑waste JPA to prepare for upcoming contract renewals
February 13, 2024 | Loomis, Placer County, California
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Loomis Town Council on Feb. 14 voted to direct staff to pursue drafting a joint powers authority (JPA) with nearby Auburn and Colfax to coordinate solid‑waste services and contract negotiations. The discussion followed a feasibility presentation by solid‑waste consultant R3 Consulting and public comment from residents and regional officials.
Scott Hannan of R3 Consulting told the council JPAs “are actually very common” in the Bay Area and argued a multi‑jurisdiction approach could give the towns more negotiating leverage and centralize regulatory reporting, including requirements from CalRecycle and Proposition 218. He said Loomis and Auburn’s franchise agreements with Recology expire in early 2024, making the timing critical for a coordinated approach. “As you get a bigger economy of scale you become more attractive and have more negotiating power,” Hannan said.
Wes (the town manager) told the council staff’s recommendation was to pursue formation of a JPA so the three managers could develop a joint powers agreement if all jurisdictions agree. Eric Otto, program manager for the Western Placer Waste Management Authority, urged the council to monitor options and offered the authority as a resource.
Public commenters raised both support and concerns. Some residents warned that Loomis’ current low rates and specific services — including senior‑can sizes and local spring cleanup days — should not be lost in a larger regional arrangement. Others, including a board member of the Rutherford Canyon HOA, voiced concern about potential rate increases tied to electrification or equipment-cost pass‑throughs. “The rates will not remain low like they currently are, whether or not we form the JPA or not,” R3 noted while describing long‑term capital needs such as electric collection vehicles.
Councilmembers discussed timing and the need to involve two absent councilmembers in the process; but a majority voted to give staff direction to proceed with JPA development and coordination with Auburn and Colfax. Councilmember Ring moved to approve staff’s recommendation and the motion passed on roll call with those present voting yes.
Next steps: staff will continue outreach with the other two jurisdictions, bring back a draft JPA agreement and options for board composition and voting, and return to council for formal review before any binding action.
Scott Hannan of R3 Consulting told the council JPAs “are actually very common” in the Bay Area and argued a multi‑jurisdiction approach could give the towns more negotiating leverage and centralize regulatory reporting, including requirements from CalRecycle and Proposition 218. He said Loomis and Auburn’s franchise agreements with Recology expire in early 2024, making the timing critical for a coordinated approach. “As you get a bigger economy of scale you become more attractive and have more negotiating power,” Hannan said.
Wes (the town manager) told the council staff’s recommendation was to pursue formation of a JPA so the three managers could develop a joint powers agreement if all jurisdictions agree. Eric Otto, program manager for the Western Placer Waste Management Authority, urged the council to monitor options and offered the authority as a resource.
Public commenters raised both support and concerns. Some residents warned that Loomis’ current low rates and specific services — including senior‑can sizes and local spring cleanup days — should not be lost in a larger regional arrangement. Others, including a board member of the Rutherford Canyon HOA, voiced concern about potential rate increases tied to electrification or equipment-cost pass‑throughs. “The rates will not remain low like they currently are, whether or not we form the JPA or not,” R3 noted while describing long‑term capital needs such as electric collection vehicles.
Councilmembers discussed timing and the need to involve two absent councilmembers in the process; but a majority voted to give staff direction to proceed with JPA development and coordination with Auburn and Colfax. Councilmember Ring moved to approve staff’s recommendation and the motion passed on roll call with those present voting yes.
Next steps: staff will continue outreach with the other two jurisdictions, bring back a draft JPA agreement and options for board composition and voting, and return to council for formal review before any binding action.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
