A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Local volunteers urge council to slow changes to fire-department ordinance tied to East Side merger

November 20, 2023 | Lock Haven, Clinton County, Pennsylvania


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Local volunteers urge council to slow changes to fire-department ordinance tied to East Side merger
Unidentified Speaker 2, speaking on behalf of volunteer fire interests, urged the Lock Haven City Council to slow work on a proposed overhaul of the city's fire-department ordinance tied to the establishment of the East Side Fire and Rescue Company. The commenter said the draft goes beyond merger language and inserts changes that could alter chief selection, advisory-board composition and day-to-day authority.

"The proposed changes go beyond those necessary for establishment of the East Side Fire and Rescue Company," the speaker said, calling out language that would make the city chief an appointed position rather than one elected by department members and warning that the chief's company could gain majority influence on the advisory board.

The speaker highlighted specific sections (noted in the draft as Sections 59-1 through 59-14) that they said remove a foreman position, introduce an undefined "administrator," lengthen the district chief's term to six years and remove the advisory board from recommendation and suspension processes. The commenter also urged replacing multiple uses of the word "fire" with broader language such as "incident" to reflect medical calls, vehicle incidents and wildfires.

Council members thanked the speaker for the detailed review and said staff and the fire companies should meet to clarify concerns before final action. One council member suggested the ordinance might need to be split or re-titled so it is clear which entities the changes affect.

Council materials and a speaker at the meeting indicated a second reading of a related item was scheduled for Dec. 4 so stakeholders could continue to meet and resolve outstanding questions. Council did not adopt the ordinance during this public comment period; the speaker asked for additional review and stakeholder input before a final vote.

Next steps: Council members asked staff to bring the concerns to the city manager and encouraged the fire companies and advisory board to meet with administration to work through the issues before the next reading.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee