Council members debated May 23 whether to pursue a charter amendment to change council compensation. Staff reminded the council that charter language controls any change and that a council action would be required to direct attorneys to draft a ballot measure. The discussion featured differing views: some members urged keeping pay low or prioritizing parks and public services, while others supported giving voters the decision.
One participant argued, “We were all elected knowing that we get $12 a year,” and later another council member said they would “much rather see a pickleball court go in than get any money.” Others raised concerns about encouraging a broader pool of candidates who might need compensation to participate. A motion was made to leave the compensation question to the voters, but the transcript shows a tie during roll call and does not record a final, clear outcome in the meeting minutes.
Because the meeting record does not definitively show final action on directing a charter amendment or drafting a ballot measure, staff or council should confirm the procedural result and, if appropriate, return the question with clear motion language at a subsequent meeting.