A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Senate committee hears bill to blacklist financial providers that 'discriminate' on firearms or fossil fuels; members request fiscal analysis and broader review

February 21, 2023 | STATE AGENCIES & GOVT'L AFFAIRS-SENATE, Senate, Committees, Legislative, Arkansas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate committee hears bill to blacklist financial providers that 'discriminate' on firearms or fossil fuels; members request fiscal analysis and broader review
Senator Ricky Hill and Representative Jeff Wardlaw presented House Bill 1307, an ESG-focused measure that would require the treasurer of state, at the direction of the attorney general, to keep a list of financial institutions deemed to "discriminate" against firearms, ammunition or fossil-fuel industries and to restrict state business accordingly. "Any financial institution in Arkansas who is banking or doing business with a company that discriminates against... firearms... and fossil fuel... will not do business with them," the sponsor said.

Sponsors said they worked with bank and retirement-system stakeholders to exempt indirect retirement system holdings from the bill’s reach; direct holdings would remain accountable. Senators asked repeatedly for a fiscal-impact assessment; sponsor Wardlaw said he had requested analyses but none were available and that excluding indirect retirement holdings reduced the projected fiscal impact. Several senators — including Senator Payton and Senator Tucker — queried the concentration of decision-making in the treasurer and attorney general and the lack of a broader, multi-member panel or explicit appeals process. Senator Payton asked whether liability protections or a larger board had been considered; sponsors said they would consider drafting changes and that other states’ approaches (e.g., Texas, West Virginia) informed the design. Senator Tucker and others expressed concern that the treasurer acting "at the direction" of the attorney general may raise separation-of-powers questions and recommended additional drafting work.

Sponsors agreed to pull the measure for additional work after committee members asked for further analysis and possible changes to the decision-making structure.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee