A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Senate agriculture committee advances bill to broaden plant board nominations, citing Supreme Court ruling

February 07, 2023 | AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - SENATE, Senate, Committees, Legislative, Arkansas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate agriculture committee advances bill to broaden plant board nominations, citing Supreme Court ruling
The Senate Agriculture, Forestry & Economic Development Committee voted to advance Senate Bill 191 after a short presentation and a voice vote.

Senator Dave Wallace of District 19, the bill's sponsor, told the committee SB 191 is "a repeat of the bill we did 2 years ago" and described it as reforming the state plant board and its nomination process to conform with "the recent Supreme Court ruling." Wallace said the change would allow the governor to choose from a wider pool of people with interests in seed growing and selling, farming, cattle, and timber. He also told the committee, "There's no known opposition."

During a brief exchange, Senator Leddy said he supported the bill "just for my own education" and asked about language on page 2 describing a "practical corn, peanuts, sorghum ... or wheat grower," questioning the use of the adjective "practical." Wallace replied that the wording is older statutory language and said, jokingly, that an "impractical" grower "doesn't last long in the business."

A motion "do pass" on SB 191 was made and seconded; the committee approved the motion by voice vote with no opposition announced on the record. The transcript does not identify who moved or seconded the motion.

After the vote, Wallace recommended the committee review other boards modeled on the plant board because there "may be future land or lawsuits" affecting those entities. The committee then adjourned and took a head count for a tour scheduled the next day of medical marijuana growing facilities and an optional dinner.

The committee did not record any formal written opposition during the meeting, and no amendments or budgetary changes were discussed. Next procedural steps (e.g., committee reporting to the full Senate) were not specified on the record.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee