A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Foster council approves majority of Planning Board’s zoning updates, removes animal criteria for separate review

February 12, 2024 | Foster, Providence County, Rhode Island


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Foster council approves majority of Planning Board’s zoning updates, removes animal criteria for separate review
The Foster Town Council on Feb. 8 voted to approve most of the Planning Board’s recommended zoning ordinance amendments but removed the animal‑category criteria from final approval for separate consideration.

In a single motion the council approved a package of changes covering sections including nonconforming dimensions, stonewall protection, procedures for variances and special‑use permits, unified development review provisions, standards for general business and commercial development, and administrative development plan review. After discussion, the council approved the motion by voice vote. A subsequent motion approved the same package "less the criteria for animals," which the council also approved by voice vote.

Planning staff said most edits were required to conform Foster’s code to recent changes in Rhode Island general law (R.I. Gen. Laws §45‑24‑57 and related sections) and to implement unified development plan review. Grant, the planning presenter, said the objective criteria requirement means each special‑use category must have specific standards, but noted the animal threshold (for example, the existing 35‑animal trigger) may conflict with Right‑to‑Farm protections. Several council members and residents urged more study; the council directed staff to return the animals language for further work.

The council also approved an amendment on substandard lots (lots smaller than 4.59 acres) required by state law that proportionally reduces setback and frontage requirements. That item passed after council members said the town had limited options because the law constrains local modifications.

No roll‑call tallies were recorded in the audio; both approvals were conducted by voice vote.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee