A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Sen. Caldwell pulls bill after lawyers and members warn 'tipping off' language is too broad

March 08, 2023 | JUDICIARY COMMITTEE - SENATE, Senate, Committees, Legislative, Arkansas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Sen. Caldwell pulls bill after lawyers and members warn 'tipping off' language is too broad
Sen. Ronald Caldwell, a sponsor from District 10, introduced legislation that would impose penalties for threatening state employees while they perform official duties and would criminalize state employees who alert others about pending state investigations. Caldwell described a rise in hostility toward agency inspectors and said the bill “is an act regarding public officers and employees to authorize a penalty for threatening a state employee in the course of his or her job duties to authorize a penalty for alerting an individual or entity of a state investigation.”

The bill drew swift criticism from Jeff Rosenzweig, an attorney with the Arkansas Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, who said the bill’s second provision — forbidding employees from ‘tipping off’ inspected parties — is “too vague” and could cover conduct that is not properly within the statute’s intended scope. Rosenzweig asked, for example, “what is an investigation and when does it formally start?” and warned the language could conflict with whistleblower protections and existing criminal statutes such as terroristic threatening and obstruction statutes.

Committee members pressed the sponsor on practical and constitutional concerns. Senators raised hypothetical situations — including routine regulatory inspections and a private business owner’s confrontation with a health inspector — that illustrated potential unintended consequences. Caldwell acknowledged those concerns and told the committee he would “go back and make it tighter,” then asked to withdraw the bill from consideration so staff could redraft the problematic provisions.

The committee also took a procedural step to expunge an earlier amendment vote so the sponsor could refile revisions on members’ calendars. No formal vote on the substantive bill was taken before Caldwell withdrew it for further work.

Next steps: Caldwell said he would rework the bill’s language addressing the ‘tipping off’ provision and return the measure later; the committee did not vote on final passage.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee