A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

House adopts resolution pushing back on EPA draft rule targeting coal-fired plants

February 27, 2023 | 2023 Utah Legislature, Utah Legislature, Utah Legislative Branch, Utah


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

House adopts resolution pushing back on EPA draft rule targeting coal-fired plants
The Utah House adopted House Concurrent Resolution 9 on Feb. 27 urging the federal government to reconsider a draft U.S. Environmental Protection Agency rule that sponsors said would effectively force closure of coal-fired power plants in the state within three years.

Representative Schultz, who sponsored the resolution, told colleagues the draft rule is "targeted at Utah" and said imposing a three-year closure timeline would be "flat out irresponsible," arguing the state could face blackouts and reliability problems similar to those experienced elsewhere. He framed the resolution as asking the federal government to avoid a forced, rapid shutdown and to work with Utah to find a more responsible path toward cleaner energy while maintaining grid reliability.

"To shut that down in 3 years is flat out irresponsible... we will have Utahns without power if this rule passes as is," Representative Schultz said on the floor. He also acknowledged the state should continue work on renewables but described the draft timeline as unworkable for Utah's electricity system.

The resolution passed the House by a vote of 57 yeas to 13 nays and will be transmitted to the Senate. The text instructs the Legislature’s leadership to register the House’s opposition and to ask federal agencies to consult more closely with state officials on timelines and reliability planning.

Floor debate did not include a recorded response from federal officials; the resolution is a legislative statement of position rather than binding state law. Supporters emphasized maintaining grid reliability and urging federal consultation; opponents did not appear on the record to offer technical rebuttals during this floor debate.

The House’s action is limited to a formal expression of the chamber’s position and does not in itself change federal requirements. It may, however, prompt state executive officials to engage with federal agencies on implementation timelines and grid planning.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee