The Rules Committee forwarded a third draft of a police‑staffing charter amendment to the full Board of Supervisors without recommendation on Nov. 6, following extensive debate among supervisors and nearly two hours of public comment from labor, community and resident speakers.
Chair Matt Dorsey opposed the version that was amended at the last minute and called it a “cop tax” because it conditions minimum staffing on a future voter‑approved tax. Dorsey said the change would deny voters the ability to prioritize existing tax dollars and cited testimony from SFPD officials describing the staffing situation as “catastrophic,” warning that about one‑third of positions were unfilled and roughly 350–400 officers were eligible for retirement.
Sponsor Supervisor Asha Safaei said the amended measure responds to fiscal realities and seeks to identify funding sources — including the possibility of restructuring existing taxes rather than only creating a new tax. Safaei and others argued the city faces a large deficit (she cited figures ranging up to a $700 million shortfall) and that an amended approach could protect other essential services while addressing staffing.
The public‑comment period included union leaders, neighborhood advocates and community groups. Speakers supporting the amended measure stressed that it no longer mandates a $200 million general‑fund set‑aside and instead aims to incorporate new or restructured revenue sources, while those opposing it warned against diverting funds from nurses, 911 dispatchers, homeless services and other programs.
Following public comment, Chair Dorsey moved to send the charter amendment to the full Board without recommendation. Vice Chair Shamann Walton and Supervisor Asha Safaei voted "aye"; Chair Dorsey voted "no." The motion passed 2–1 in committee. The measure will be considered by the full Board of Supervisors; any final funding mechanism and implementation details will be resolved there.