A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee continues HOME SF amendments, advances rezoning and several referrals to full board

April 24, 2023 | San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee continues HOME SF amendments, advances rezoning and several referrals to full board
The Land Use & Transportation Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors met April 24 and took a mix of continuances and referrals on several agenda items.

Supervisors continued two related ordinances tied to HOME SF (Homeownership Means Equity) — one amending the Planning Code to exclude designated historic districts and a second adjusting HOME SF requirements and rent‑control disclosures — after Sponsor amendments were read into the record. Supervisor Aaron Peskin moved to amend item 2 with the circulated changes and then made a separate motion to continue items 1 and 2 together to the committee’s next meeting; the motion to continue passed 3–0.

The committee recommended an ordinance to rezone Assessor’s Parcel Block 0976 Lot 001 to permit up to 47 tourist‑hotel rooms and affirmed appropriate findings; Planning staff said the rezoning follows a settlement that includes payments to support a veterans permanent supportive‑housing program. The committee voted 3–0 to forward the rezoning to the full board with a positive recommendation.

Separately the committee sent several items to the full board as committee reports or recommendations: the proposed Environmental Justice Framework and related General Plan introduction (sent with a positive recommendation), and a LAFCO study and resident‑engagement request concerning Midtown Park Apartments (moved as a committee report). Where members requested more detail before action — most notably the MOHCD delegation item concerning ground‑lease amendments and residual‑receipts changes — the committee voted to continue so staff can supply additional information.

Votes were recorded verbally at the meeting; where roll‑call was conducted supervisors Peskin, Preston and Melgar voted aye on the items noted above. The committee adjourned after completing the agenda.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee