A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee amends and duplicates ADU ordinance to meet state pro‑housing deadlines, defers certain rent‑control amendments

February 05, 2024 | San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee amends and duplicates ADU ordinance to meet state pro‑housing deadlines, defers certain rent‑control amendments
Committee members on Feb. 5 reviewed an ordinance to amend the planning code to clarify ministerial approval for state‑mandated accessory dwelling units (ADUs), permit certain rear‑yard ADUs, and reconcile local procedures with state law.

Veronica Flores of the Planning Department described clarifying amendments — removing inaccurate uncodified findings, clarifying density calculations, and altering notice and special‑restriction recording language. President Peskin said he had drafted additional amendments to steer more ADU applicants into the local rent‑controlled program but withdrew them after the state Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) expressed disagreement with the city's legal interpretation. “We were told HCD may have taken action to harm the ability of our local affordable housing developers to access state funding,” Peskin said, explaining the political and legal tension.

Planning staff gave a tentative timeline: a March 7 Planning Commission hearing and the possibility of a March 19 second reading to meet a pro‑housing designation milestone that affects eligibility for competitive state affordable‑housing and transportation funds. Housing advocates and funders (SPUR, Housing Action Coalition, Council of Community Housing Organizations) urged passage to protect several grant applications totaling hundreds of millions of dollars in potential funding and support ready projects.

Given the legal sensitivity, the committee voted to duplicate the file, amend the original with Planning Department modifications and continue the amended original to the call of the chair pending Planning Commission review; the duplicated file was continued one week to allow the committee to incorporate additional amendments.

The committee stressed the importance of the pro‑housing designation for project competitiveness while recognizing state oversight may constrain local rent‑control preferences.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee