A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee adopts amendments on Sacred Heart landmarking; votes to continue for posting

February 26, 2024 | San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee adopts amendments on Sacred Heart landmarking; votes to continue for posting
The Land Use & Transportation Committee on Feb. 26 considered an ordinance to designate the Sacred Heart Parish Complex as a San Francisco landmark and unanimously approved substantive amendments before continuing the item for one week so the public can review the changes.

Planning Department staff explained that the Historic Preservation Commission had earlier recommended landmark designation, citing the complex’s Romanesque Revival architecture, association with Father Eugene Boyle and significance to local history. Planning staff noted multiple owners and a complex multi‑building nomination that required an extended review period.

Vice Chair Dean Preston circulated four substantive amendments that add findings about exterior and interior features (including stained glass and the bell), clarify the process and standards for “replacement in kind,” and explicitly include the wooden connector bridge as a character‑defining exterior feature. Preservationists and parishioners at public comment urged that interior frescoes, the choir loft and other elements be protected and asked the Board to require city approval before any replacement in kind.

Planning staff and owner representatives discussed safety and restoration challenges for some interior elements. After debate, the committee voted to amend the ordinance as presented and to continue the item to March 4, 2024, to allow a week for the amended language to be posted and reviewed by stakeholders.

Vice Chair Preston stated the amendments were substantive, so they will be posted and reviewed; the committee recorded three ayes on the motion to amend and again on the motion to continue the item.

The continuation is intended to ensure public access to the amended text and to allow affected stakeholders time to comment further at the subsequent hearing.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee