Committee backs sale of City Hall transferable development rights to fund preservation
October 07, 2021 | San Francisco County, California
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Government Audit & Oversight Committee on Oct. 7 voted to recommend a resolution authorizing the sale of up to 1,200,000 gross square feet of transferable development rights (TDRs) from San Francisco City Hall.
Andrico Penick, the director of real estate, explained the City Hall TDR program and the planned sales structure. "The base price for the City Hall TDRs will be $37.50 per unit," Penick said, describing a dynamic pricing schedule that increases if market demand reaches higher sales thresholds and a projected gross‑proceeds range of $41 million to $50 million.
Penick described how TDR mechanics work: a historic building owner (here, the city) can sell development potential to a developer constrained by floor‑area ratio (FAR) limits so the developer can reach an existing legal height limit. Penick said proceeds of City Hall TDR sales are restricted to rehabilitation and restoration of City Hall; projects cited included dome revitalization (~$20 million), roof and dome leak repair (~$3 million) and exterior stone and grout work (~$7 million).
Nick Menard of the Budget and Legislative Analyst’s Office reviewed the request and recommended approval, noting consistency with prior Board actions and that the resolution would limit the use of funds to City Hall historic preservation. Supervisors asked about timing of purchases relative to entitlement and inclusionary housing obligations; city staff explained the zoning administrator maintains a register of certificates and that inclusionary requirements apply to the full project if a housing project gains units by using purchased TDRs.
Vice Chair Connie Chan moved to recommend the resolution to the full Board; the committee approved the recommendation unanimously (Chan — aye; Mandelmann — aye; Preston — aye).
Why it matters: The sale is designed to monetize unused development rights in order to fund capital preservation of a major civic historic asset. The committee approved forwarding the item to the Board for consideration, subject to the usual Board process.
What’s next: The matter will go to the full Board of Supervisors for action on the recommended resolution.
Andrico Penick, the director of real estate, explained the City Hall TDR program and the planned sales structure. "The base price for the City Hall TDRs will be $37.50 per unit," Penick said, describing a dynamic pricing schedule that increases if market demand reaches higher sales thresholds and a projected gross‑proceeds range of $41 million to $50 million.
Penick described how TDR mechanics work: a historic building owner (here, the city) can sell development potential to a developer constrained by floor‑area ratio (FAR) limits so the developer can reach an existing legal height limit. Penick said proceeds of City Hall TDR sales are restricted to rehabilitation and restoration of City Hall; projects cited included dome revitalization (~$20 million), roof and dome leak repair (~$3 million) and exterior stone and grout work (~$7 million).
Nick Menard of the Budget and Legislative Analyst’s Office reviewed the request and recommended approval, noting consistency with prior Board actions and that the resolution would limit the use of funds to City Hall historic preservation. Supervisors asked about timing of purchases relative to entitlement and inclusionary housing obligations; city staff explained the zoning administrator maintains a register of certificates and that inclusionary requirements apply to the full project if a housing project gains units by using purchased TDRs.
Vice Chair Connie Chan moved to recommend the resolution to the full Board; the committee approved the recommendation unanimously (Chan — aye; Mandelmann — aye; Preston — aye).
Why it matters: The sale is designed to monetize unused development rights in order to fund capital preservation of a major civic historic asset. The committee approved forwarding the item to the Board for consideration, subject to the usual Board process.
What’s next: The matter will go to the full Board of Supervisors for action on the recommended resolution.
Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!
Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.
✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
30-day money-back guarantee
