Committee OKs forwarding Civic Bridge behested-payments waiver after privacy and retroactivity questions
January 25, 2023 | San Francisco County, California
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Budget & Finance Committee voted Jan. 25 to send to the full Board a resolution authorizing the Mayor
nd the Department of Technology to solicit in-kind donations for the Civic Bridge program notwithstanding the city ehested-payments ordinance.
Pete Kittler, director of the Mayor
nd Innovation Office, described Civic Bridge as "a 16 week, cohort-based program" that pairs city departments with skilled volunteers from private firms for scoped deliverables. He told supervisors the program has completed about 80 projects across 34 departments and worked with roughly 28 pro bono partners, claiming roughly 52,718 volunteer hours and nearly $7.85 million of pro bono value.
Supervisor Chan pressed staff on conflict-of-interest safeguards and the ordinance language, expressing concern about a six-month waiver window and about retroactive acceptance of in-kind work. "I think those are very nuanced conversations that the city should have," Chan said, asking where listed partners came from and whether retroactive acceptances could short-circuit committee review. Deputy City Attorney Anne Pearson explained the behested-payments ordinance generally prohibits solicitations from interested parties but allows exceptions by Board resolution for departments (not the Board itself) so long as the resolution explains why the exception is in the public interest.
Kittler said Civic Bridge generally avoids matching a partner with a department where that partner has an active contract and committed to bring any non-procurement strategy work; he offered to return with non-retroactive acceptance language on prospective projects and pledged additional opportunities for committee review. Vice Chair Asha Safaie and other supervisors expressed support for the program while also emphasizing oversight and said they would add conditions to limit retroactivity and conflicts.
The committee amended the item consistent with BLA clarifications and voted 3-0 to forward the resolution to the full Board with a positive recommendation.
nd the Department of Technology to solicit in-kind donations for the Civic Bridge program notwithstanding the city ehested-payments ordinance.
Pete Kittler, director of the Mayor
nd Innovation Office, described Civic Bridge as "a 16 week, cohort-based program" that pairs city departments with skilled volunteers from private firms for scoped deliverables. He told supervisors the program has completed about 80 projects across 34 departments and worked with roughly 28 pro bono partners, claiming roughly 52,718 volunteer hours and nearly $7.85 million of pro bono value.
Supervisor Chan pressed staff on conflict-of-interest safeguards and the ordinance language, expressing concern about a six-month waiver window and about retroactive acceptance of in-kind work. "I think those are very nuanced conversations that the city should have," Chan said, asking where listed partners came from and whether retroactive acceptances could short-circuit committee review. Deputy City Attorney Anne Pearson explained the behested-payments ordinance generally prohibits solicitations from interested parties but allows exceptions by Board resolution for departments (not the Board itself) so long as the resolution explains why the exception is in the public interest.
Kittler said Civic Bridge generally avoids matching a partner with a department where that partner has an active contract and committed to bring any non-procurement strategy work; he offered to return with non-retroactive acceptance language on prospective projects and pledged additional opportunities for committee review. Vice Chair Asha Safaie and other supervisors expressed support for the program while also emphasizing oversight and said they would add conditions to limit retroactivity and conflicts.
The committee amended the item consistent with BLA clarifications and voted 3-0 to forward the resolution to the full Board with a positive recommendation.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
