A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Board denies neighbor’s jurisdiction request over 99 Saint Germain elevator permit

December 06, 2023 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board denies neighbor’s jurisdiction request over 99 Saint Germain elevator permit
The San Francisco Board of Appeals on Dec. 6 denied a jurisdiction request from an adjacent neighbor challenging a permit to install an elevator at 99 Saint Germain.

The request, filed Nov. 6, asked the board to take jurisdiction over alteration permit number 202208049876, which planning records show was issued Oct. 5, 2023; the appeal period ended Oct. 20, 2023. Requester Edward Yee told the board he and other neighbors were not notified and asked the board to retake jurisdiction. During his public comment he raised safety concerns and characterized the ongoing disputes with the permit holder as severe.

Emily Charley, attorney for the permit holders, denied allegations of criminal conduct and said the jurisdiction request failed to meet the legal standard. Planning Department Deputy Zoning Administrator Tina Tam told the board that both permits for the shared elevator (permit numbers ending in 9876 and 9878) were filed and processed concurrently, that mail notices were sent to owners and residents within a 100‑foot radius and that a 3‑11 poster was posted on the property from Dec. 16, 2022 through Jan. 16, 2023. DBI’s Matthew Green corroborated Planning’s account, verified a signature on the permit application and said he saw no error by the city that would justify jurisdiction.

A commissioner moved to deny the jurisdiction request on the ground the city did not intentionally or inadvertently cause the requester to miss the appeal deadline. The motion passed 5‑0 and the request was denied.

Next steps were not specified at the meeting; the board made no substantive change to the permits themselves during this proceeding.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee