A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Planning Commission approves revised house at 40320 Eighth Street after demolition tally error

April 01, 2021 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Planning Commission approves revised house at 40320 Eighth Street after demolition tally error
The San Francisco Planning Commission voted 5-2 on April 1 to approve a conditional use authorization for the property at 40320 Eighth Street in Noe Valley after the project sponsor revised plans to include a second dwelling unit.

Linda Ajeelo Hoagland of the Planning Department said the project originally permitted a three-story single-family residence but exceeded demolition thresholds during construction, prompting enforcement and a subsequent CUA application. Hoagland told commissioners the department recommends approval with conditions, noting the revised plans provide a 456-square-foot studio and a 2,149-square-foot three-bedroom unit while retaining the previously approved building envelope.

Architect Michael Rogers told the commission the overage resulted from contractor and calculation errors. "There was an error made by the general contractor and not following the proper procedure," Rogers said, and he acknowledged an architect's mistake in counting the attic floor as a horizontal plane in demolition calculations. Rogers said his clients had decided the second unit better serves the city's housing needs.

Commissioners questioned livability details for the studio and whether more garage space could be converted to habitable area. Commissioner Moore asked why the kitchen and living area were arranged in a way that reduced perceived living space; Rogers answered that plumbing already in the concrete slab made reconfiguration costly. Commissioner Chan and others expressed concern about the studio's small size (456 square feet) compared with other accessory units.

Despite those reservations, Commissioner Tanner said the project met the commission's objectives to increase density and provide private outdoor space. The motion to approve carried 5-2, with Commissioners Imperial and Moore voting against.

The approval includes standard conditions of the department and any design refinements noted on the record; the project sponsor said construction would wait until existing tenants voluntarily vacate the property.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee