A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Commission approves 124 Fillmore stacker garage after neighbors warn of excavation risk

February 29, 2024 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission approves 124 Fillmore stacker garage after neighbors warn of excavation risk
The Planning Commission voted to approve a discretionary review application for a two‑story garage with a three‑vehicle stacking system and roof deck at 124 Fillmore Street after hearing opposition from nearby residents who said the excavation and machinery risk damage to adjacent historic timber structures.

Planning staff noted the proposal was consistent with the residential design guidelines and that a variance originally granted in 2005 for the same scope remains reinstated and valid. The staff report said structural soundness and a construction plan would be verified by the Department of Building Inspection before final permit issuance.

Opponents said the proposed 10‑foot excavation and proximity of a multi‑car stacker raised real risks to neighboring foundations, vibration and noise. Several neighbors and a nearby property owner urged the commission to reject the project or require stronger mitigation and monitoring plans.

Project sponsor David Nail said the zoning allows three parking spaces on site and that he will follow code and best practices; he corrected an earlier public assertion by noting the garage is two stories (not three). A longtime former SFFD plan reviewer (retired) who consulted for the project said building and fire have reviewed the condition and that DBI/Fire have not identified barriers to approval.

After deliberation the commission voted unanimously to not take discretionary review and to approve the project; DBI will verify excavation, structural shoring and vibration mitigation during permit review and will require monitoring and construction plans as necessary.

Next steps: DBI and Fire technical checks and permit issuance; opponents may pursue appeals or seek enforcement if construction causes damage.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee