DAS says state miscalculation will be corrected; area‑plan contract approved pending amendment
September 01, 2021 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Department of Disability and Aging Services presented and the commission approved the California Department of Aging area‑plan contract (AP 21‑22‑06) Sept. 1, while flagging a funding miscalculation that the state has agreed to correct.
Program Director Michael Zogg took commissioners through a 98‑page area‑plan packet and identified line‑by‑line changes compared with the prior year. He said staff noticed what appeared to be a large decline in the packet for congregate nutrition ($467,224) that resulted from a statewide calculation error. Zogg said DAS raised the issue with the California Department of Aging (CDA), which acknowledged the problem and issued preliminary guidance indicating an amendment will be issued that corrects congregate nutrition and brings roughly $1.1 million in additional funds to the department.
Zogg told the commission that, because CDA’s amendment is expected, staff recommended approving the current contract to allow administrative execution and to maintain program continuity; he committed to return to the commission with an informational update and the final amendment details. Commissioners approved the contract on a roll call vote; an objection was recorded on the floor but the motion passed and the vote was recorded as unanimous.
Zogg also described year‑to‑year variances across Older Americans Act titles: modest increases in supportive services (transportation, legal services and short‑term home care), a small decrease in Ombudsman funding, a large apparent decline in congregate nutrition (the miscalculation), a decline in home‑delivered meals, and a modest increase in family caregiver funding. He said some decreases are small and will not result in service reductions, and that CDA amendments commonly adjust contracts during the fiscal year.
The commission directed staff to present the CDA amendment and a full allocation breakdown when finalized; Zogg suggested an informational return as soon as October. The department said it expects to use subsequent amendment authority to reflect corrected allocations once CDA provides final figures.
The meeting minutes will reflect the discussion and the staff commitment to return with amendment materials.
Program Director Michael Zogg took commissioners through a 98‑page area‑plan packet and identified line‑by‑line changes compared with the prior year. He said staff noticed what appeared to be a large decline in the packet for congregate nutrition ($467,224) that resulted from a statewide calculation error. Zogg said DAS raised the issue with the California Department of Aging (CDA), which acknowledged the problem and issued preliminary guidance indicating an amendment will be issued that corrects congregate nutrition and brings roughly $1.1 million in additional funds to the department.
Zogg told the commission that, because CDA’s amendment is expected, staff recommended approving the current contract to allow administrative execution and to maintain program continuity; he committed to return to the commission with an informational update and the final amendment details. Commissioners approved the contract on a roll call vote; an objection was recorded on the floor but the motion passed and the vote was recorded as unanimous.
Zogg also described year‑to‑year variances across Older Americans Act titles: modest increases in supportive services (transportation, legal services and short‑term home care), a small decrease in Ombudsman funding, a large apparent decline in congregate nutrition (the miscalculation), a decline in home‑delivered meals, and a modest increase in family caregiver funding. He said some decreases are small and will not result in service reductions, and that CDA amendments commonly adjust contracts during the fiscal year.
The commission directed staff to present the CDA amendment and a full allocation breakdown when finalized; Zogg suggested an informational return as soon as October. The department said it expects to use subsequent amendment authority to reflect corrected allocations once CDA provides final figures.
The meeting minutes will reflect the discussion and the staff commitment to return with amendment materials.
Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!
Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.
✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
30-day money-back guarantee
