A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Abatement Appeals Board elects Commissioner Tam president; Commissioner Epler named vice president

February 16, 2022 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Abatement Appeals Board elects Commissioner Tam president; Commissioner Epler named vice president
The Abatement Appeals Board elected Commissioner Tam as its president and Commissioner Epler as vice president during a brief, procedural meeting.

After nominations and a procedural explanation from the board’s legal advisor, the panel held a roll-call vote on an initial nomination of Commissioner Summer for president; the motion failed when Summer and two other commissioners recorded “no” votes. In a subsequent vote, Commissioner Tam drew five affirmative votes and was declared president. Commissioner Epler was then elected vice president in a unanimous vote.

The nominations round included multiple proposals: one speaker nominated Commissioner Summer for president and Commissioner Epler for vice president; Commissioner Beto nominated Commissioner Tam for president; Commissioner McCarthy offered alternative pairings. The board followed its stated procedure of voting on nominees in the order the nominations were received.

Votes at a glance: the president’s election passed 5–1; the vice-president election was unanimous. The board also voted earlier in the meeting to renew findings authorizing remote meetings under state law and approved minutes from a prior meeting.

Unidentified Speaker (land acknowledgment) opened the meeting with a land acknowledgment, saying, "The Abatement Appeals Board acknowledges that we are on the unceded ancestral homeland of the Rheinmetus Ohlone, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula." The board confirmed a quorum before moving to business.

The meeting included procedural clarification from the board’s legal advisor about nomination and voting order and whether seconds were required. After votes concluded, a Deputy City Attorney offered congratulations, and the chair announced the results and the new officers.

The board adjourned at approximately 9:25 a.m.; staff noted the Building Inspection Commission meeting was scheduled to begin at 9:30 a.m.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee