A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Commissioners review permit-expediter settlement and announce two closed-session probable-cause votes

June 11, 2021 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commissioners review permit-expediter settlement and announce two closed-session probable-cause votes
Senior investigator Jeff Zingwalt briefed commissioners on the city attorney's settlement with permit expediter Walter Wong and described the permanent consultant reporting requirements and penalties. Zingwalt said Wong admitted to 12 violations for undisclosed contacts and campaign contributions and was assessed maximum administrative penalties and late fees.

Zingwalt summarized the permit consultant rules: permanent consultants who contact Building Inspection, Planning or Public Works on behalf of large ($1M+) construction projects must file monthly disclosure reports identifying clients, contact employees, compensation and contributions. Penalties include administrative fines up to $5,000 per violation, a treble penalty for unreported campaign contributions and $50 per day late fees for required filings.

Commissioners asked whether the settlement had been calendared; staff said the matter was assigned to the Board of Supervisors' Government Audit and Oversight Committee and not yet heard. Several commissioners urged more outreach to permit consultants and improved department-to-department communication so the Ethics Commission can better detect unreported activity.

Closed-session actions: The commission then moved into closed session on anticipated litigation and later announced two actions. On one whistleblower-related matter the commission voted not to ratify staff recommendation of no probable cause (vote: 4 in favor of not ratifying, 1 opposed — Commissioners Busch, Chu, Lee and Ambrose voted to not ratify; Commissioner Bell opposed). On a second matter the commission ratified the staff recommendation of no probable cause (vote: 5-0). The chair announced both outcomes on return to open session.

Public reaction: Public callers expressed frustration with perceived corruption and urged stronger enforcement; one public commenter identified herself as a whistleblower and thanked staff for clearer whistleblower reporting in the annual report draft.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee