A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Ethics Commission holds closed session on labor negotiations after procedural votes; disclosure motion fails to meet 3-member threshold

March 10, 2023 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Ethics Commission holds closed session on labor negotiations after procedural votes; disclosure motion fails to meet 3-member threshold
The San Francisco Ethics Commission debated and then entered a closed session on labor negotiations after procedural votes and clarifications about attendees.

At the start of item 8, the chair outlined the steps for considering a closed session, referencing state and local legal authorities. A first motion to move into closed session failed because only two members voted in the affirmative. Deputy City Attorney Bridal Russell told the commission the required vote threshold was a quorum "so you need 3 votes for the motion to be successful."

Commissioners then questioned which outside or union representatives would attend. Commissioner Bush raised concerns about including certain employee representatives listed on the agenda; staff and the city attorney's office clarified the invited participants would be commission staff, the DHR director, and representatives from the city attorney's office — not union representatives — and Commissioner Bush indicated that clarification was satisfactory.

After that clarification, the commission renewed the motion and recorded three affirmative votes, and the body moved into closed session to meet with the labor negotiator. The public transcript does not include the closed-session deliberations; instead the public feed carried unrelated SF GovTV programming during that time.

Upon reconvening in open session, the commission considered a motion "not to disclose" closed-session deliberations. Deputy City Attorney Brid al Russell explained that disclosure would require an affirmative vote of three members, and because that threshold was not met the commission did not take an affirmative action to disclose the closed-session materials; DCA Russell summarized that absent further action the materials will remain confidential. Commissioners discussed procedural options but no additional disclosure vote was recorded on the public record.

The record shows the chair, Commissioner Romano and Commissioner Bush as the three members participating in the votes; specific closed-session content and any negotiated outcomes were not released on the public transcript.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee