A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Leesburg planning staff recommendation rejected for Leatherleaf project after commission roll call

December 20, 2024 | Leesburg City, Lake County, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Leesburg planning staff recommendation rejected for Leatherleaf project after commission roll call
The Leesburg Planning Commission voted on Dec. 19 to reject the Leatherleaf large-scale comprehensive plan amendment (LSCP24253) and the associated PUD rezoning (PUD24254) after staff recommended approval.

Staff described the project as an annexation and rezoning of roughly 73.2 acres north of County Road 48 and east of County Road 33 to allow 235 detached single-family homes, 48 paired villas (duplexes) and about 120,000 square feet of commercial uses. Planning staff noted required infrastructure and transportation improvements that Lake County Public Works requested, including left- and right-turn lanes, additional right-of-way on County Road 48 and 33, and accommodations for the West Lake Trail. Staff also noted school concurrency and a 48-month phasing clause that would revert the property to R-1 zoning if substantial commencement does not occur.

After the staff presentation and applicant remarks, a motion to approve failed for lack of a second. A later motion to reject the application carried on roll call. The transcript records Commissioner O'Kelley, Commissioner Simeone, Commissioner Ackerman and Commissioner Kaplan voting "Yes," while Commissioner Sandals and Commissioner Senate voted "No" on the LSCP item. The commission took a separate roll call on the PUD item with similar mixed votes recorded in the transcript; the chair closed discussion and the rejected recommendation will be forwarded to the City Commission for final action.

The record shows the commission was concerned about transportation impacts and infrastructure obligations under county review. Staff had recommended approval conditioned on meeting statutory and compatibility criteria, but the commission's recommendation was to reject, meaning the City Commission will see a negative recommendation from the planning commission.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee