Parents press board on hiring, background checks and explicit library material; calls for greater transparency

Several members of the public used the district's public comment period at the April 15 meeting to press Forest Hills Public Schools for clearer hiring safeguards, faster updates on a personnel-related criminal complaint, and action on library content.

Doug Lee urged the new superintendent to prioritize academics, saying test scores and enrollment are falling. Multiple speakers focused on a personnel matter: Vincent Mahler said a March U.S. District Court criminal complaint was filed against an employee alleging distribution, receipt and possession of child sexual material and said the accused had been in proximity to K'4 graders; Mahler asked whether the district conducted a "process walk" to find hiring gaps and requested a timeline for updates.

Robin Vanderjag told the board she reviewed the book at issue and said it "contains graphic descriptions of minors being sexually abused" and that three counseling professionals and a retired assistant prosecuting attorney told her it does not belong on a high school shelf; she recommended the book be moved to a secured location available only to an adult guardian on request. In public comment, speakers avoided alleging board culpability but urged clearer procedures and more frequent public updates.

Scott VanSol described gaps in background checks when allegations do not result in arrest or conviction and suggested requiring applicants to sign a notarized release allowing the district to request police records from prior employers and jurisdictions. Kevin Donovan raised separate concerns about cumulative family fees (citing athletic and activity costs he said totaled hundreds of dollars) and questioned availability of backup materials the community could review before votes.

The board's public statements at the meeting acknowledged limits on commenting about active criminal investigations; Dr. Michaud and the superintendent referenced prior district communications (news releases and an FAQ) but did not provide new details at this meeting. Commenters asked the district to provide a timeline for updates, to clarify hiring and background-check changes the district will consider, and to indicate how library materials will be reviewed.