A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Commissioners approve rezoning for 1,800‑sq‑ft farm‑food grocery on Washburn Road (Case 24‑06)

April 03, 2024 | Cleveland County, North Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commissioners approve rezoning for 1,800‑sq‑ft farm‑food grocery on Washburn Road (Case 24‑06)
The Cleveland County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously to approve Case 24‑06, rezoning a half‑acre portion of parcel 66377 on Washburn Road from Residential to Neighborhood Business to permit a conditional use farm‑food grocery.

Chris Martin presented the application on behalf of petitioner Travis Baumgartner, describing a proposed 1,800‑square‑foot building with six parking spaces and required Type B screening. Martin told the board that the applicant submitted a site plan and that the planning board reviewed the application and recommended approval, finding the request consistent with the county’s future land‑use plan for a primary growth area.

During commissioner questions, Martin clarified that an adjacent sawmill is on a neighboring parcel, not the subject lot, and that the proposed six parking spaces meet the county’s local parking ordinance requirements for the building’s size. A commissioner asked whether the store would operate more like a farmers’ market or a convenience store; Martin said it had been described as a 'farm food style grocery.'

Public comment included a brief remark from a sign‑up carrying the same name that had addressed an earlier agenda item and a statement from Noah Hofstadler in favor of the store, noting community interest in increased access to fresh produce and healthier food options.

After the hearing was closed, a commissioner moved to approve Case 24‑06 and another seconded; the board voted with no recorded opposition and the motion carried unanimously.

The transcript does not record detailed operating hours, specific conditions beyond required Type B screening, or a finalized parking plan beyond the six spaces described; the planning office indicated compliance with the local ordinance but did not cite a specific ordinance number during the presentation.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee