Commissioner proposes splitting county clerk and auditor; public strongly supports separation, item continued for study

Commissioner Sakovich presented an ordinance proposal to separate Utah County’s clerk and auditor functions — a change that would reverse a 1989 decision consolidating the offices — and framed the split as a response to population growth, statutory thresholds and concerns about audit independence.

Sakovich outlined historical research and consultations with past officials and county staff, and estimated the cost of restoring a separate county clerk at roughly $122,000 plus benefits and some infrastructure adjustments. He argued separation would improve specialization and reduce conflicts where a combined official oversees record-keeping and financial auditing. Other commissioners raised concerns about staff redistribution, merit vs. appointed positions, costs and implementation details, and proposed alternatives including establishing an audit committee to direct internal audits without creating a second elected office.

Public comment was extensive and largely in favor of separation. Speakers argued separation would reduce perceived conflicts of interest around elections and financial oversight; several called for the auditor to be “an island” independent of other county functions. Members of the public, including local residents and policy advisers, urged the commission to separate the offices and to ensure the auditor is elected and insulated from clerk duties.

After discussion, commissioners agreed to convene a small group of staff and elected officials (named during the meeting) to study office space, staffing, legal requirements and costs, and to schedule a follow-up work session. The commission voted to continue the item and hold a work session (motion passed 3–0). Separately, the commission voted 2–1 to strike a related agenda item that would have established an audit committee, leaving the committee proposal off the agenda pending the study.

Why it matters: The split touches statutory interpretation, election administration and internal audit independence. It could change the structure of county government, staffing designations and how election and financial oversight are organized.

What’s next: The commission will convene the study group and return the matter to a work session; staff will prepare more detailed cost, staffing and legal analysis before any final vote.