Utah County Commission approves narrow amendment allowing shared driveways in limited rural cases
November 10, 2021 | Utah County Commission Meeting Minutes, Utah County Commission, Utah County Commission and Boards, Utah County, Utah
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Utah County Commission on Nov. 10 approved an amendment to sections 4.44 and 4.48 of the Utah County Land Use Ordinance that allows limited shared driveways in M and G‑1, CE‑1 and CE‑2 zones when specific access constraints exist.
Daniel Jensen, Community Development, told the commissioners the change responds to properties that cannot reasonably obtain access from their frontage because of steep slopes, stream crossings, UDOT access restrictions or railroad corridors. "In those types of scenarios, we allow a shared driveway, and that shared driveway could initiate from a point along the road that is outside of the frontage for the lot that it serves," Jensen said, adding that staff limited the proposal in several ways.
Rob Moore of the County Attorney's Office summarized the restrictions. "The point of access is no more than 330 feet from the subject property," Moore said, and the shared access must involve immediately adjacent parcels; the shared access must comply with building and fire requirements so emergency services can find and reach homes.
Under the approved language the shared access is allowed only when (1) the lots are immediately adjacent, (2) the access point is within 330 feet of the lot frontage, (3) an easement is recorded outlining permitted access, (4) the configuration complies with building and fire codes, and (5) a qualifying constraint exists (for example, stream crossing or UDOT refusal to permit frontage access).
Commissioners debated whether the language was tight enough to prevent broader use. Commissioner Gardner said staff "have thought of any potential conflicts" and supported approval. One commissioner asked whether the 12% grade threshold might be too permissive; staff responded the slope threshold aligns with fire-code limits and other safety standards.
A motion to approve the amendment was made and seconded; the clerk recorded verbal approval with three commissioners saying "aye." The commission announced that agenda item 19 passes.
Daniel Jensen, Community Development, told the commissioners the change responds to properties that cannot reasonably obtain access from their frontage because of steep slopes, stream crossings, UDOT access restrictions or railroad corridors. "In those types of scenarios, we allow a shared driveway, and that shared driveway could initiate from a point along the road that is outside of the frontage for the lot that it serves," Jensen said, adding that staff limited the proposal in several ways.
Rob Moore of the County Attorney's Office summarized the restrictions. "The point of access is no more than 330 feet from the subject property," Moore said, and the shared access must involve immediately adjacent parcels; the shared access must comply with building and fire requirements so emergency services can find and reach homes.
Under the approved language the shared access is allowed only when (1) the lots are immediately adjacent, (2) the access point is within 330 feet of the lot frontage, (3) an easement is recorded outlining permitted access, (4) the configuration complies with building and fire codes, and (5) a qualifying constraint exists (for example, stream crossing or UDOT refusal to permit frontage access).
Commissioners debated whether the language was tight enough to prevent broader use. Commissioner Gardner said staff "have thought of any potential conflicts" and supported approval. One commissioner asked whether the 12% grade threshold might be too permissive; staff responded the slope threshold aligns with fire-code limits and other safety standards.
A motion to approve the amendment was made and seconded; the clerk recorded verbal approval with three commissioners saying "aye." The commission announced that agenda item 19 passes.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
