The Board of County Commissioners voted 2–1 on May 30 to send a letter to the city regarding a jail assessment, after a lengthy debate about overcrowding, revenue from boarding prisoners and the county’s outstanding jail debt.
Unidentified Speaker 3 moved to advance "the letter to the city regarding the gel assessment" to the regular agenda and later said they would "be voting no on it," arguing parts of the letter were factually incomplete and that the county needs a broader study and discussion with the city before sending the letter. "We do need to figure out what's going on with the court system," the speaker said, urging further work with the city and proposing a Thursday discussion to explore options.
Unidentified Speaker 1 said the letter reflected input from the county attorney, the sheriff and the detention captain and defended its factual basis. "We have federal prisoners," the speaker said, adding, "they pay the bill for the debt that we incurred, which is $7,000,000 left." Unidentified Speaker 4 also said they would support the letter but asked that the county be involved in drafting any request for proposals so county concerns could be included.
Speakers disagreed over remedies and causes. Unidentified Speaker 3 pointed to examples in other jurisdictions — citing Gallatin County's choice to stop accepting state prisoners — and said removing state or federal prisoners could affect the county's ability to repay past borrowing tied to jail construction. The speakers repeatedly emphasized the need for a careful study to identify contributors to overcrowding and to define the county's options.
After discussion, the board voted to send the letter to the city; the chair announced the motion passed by a 2–1 vote. The board indicated it would pursue further internal discussion about how to participate in or augment any city-led study.