A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Commission backs funeral home rezoning and CUP at Ocotillo & Hawes

November 12, 2025 | Queen Creek, Maricopa County, Arizona


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission backs funeral home rezoning and CUP at Ocotillo & Hawes
The Queen Creek Planning & Zoning Commission approved a rezone, site plan and conditional use permit for a proposed funeral home on approximately 2.72 acres at the northwest corner of Ocotillo and Hawes.

Les Johnson, principal planner, described the project as a request to rezone the three‑parcel site to C‑2 to allow a roughly 7,600‑square‑foot funeral home with 66 parking spaces (the proposal exceeds minimum parking requirements). He noted a 6‑foot perimeter wall will be placed near three abutting residences, a stormwater drainage easement exists along the west edge, and access will be a full access on Ocotillo and a right‑in/right‑out on Hawes. Johnson said designs include a porte‑cochere facing Ocotillo and materials such as tile and stone veneer, with building heights generally around 18 feet and projecting elements up to 28 feet.

Johnson summarized neighborhood outreach: a June 23 meeting drew six residents and produced one substantive question about cremation, which the applicant addressed. "The main question was, will there be any type of a cremation activity occurring on-site?" Johnson said; staff and the applicant represented that cremation would not be part of the operation.

Applicant representative Sean Lake identified SCI as the operator and argued the funeral home is a low‑impact, dignified use appropriate for the corner. "This is a service that everybody needs," Lake said, and reiterated that no crematory is proposed.

The commission recorded a motion to approve rezone P23‑0173, rezone P24‑0071, site plan P25008 and the conditional use permit; the motion was seconded and voted to pass.

The staff report and project packet include a written comment in opposition from a non‑neighbor citing incompatibility and traffic concerns. Because the site involves annexation of a small unincorporated island parcel, related annexation paperwork will be considered by council concurrently as required by process. The commission’s action was a recommendation to council and represented staff’s and the applicant’s stated conditions and clarifications.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee