A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Plan Commission backs local historic designation for 312 E. Ninth St., former Zion United Methodist Church

October 22, 2025 | Marshfield, Wood County, Wisconsin


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Plan Commission backs local historic designation for 312 E. Ninth St., former Zion United Methodist Church
The Marshfield Plan Commission voted Oct. 21 to forward a recommendation to locally designate 312 East Ninth Street (the former Zion United Methodist Church) to the local historic registry.

James Leven, city planner presenting for the Historic Preservation Commission, said the property — built in 1925 and designed by Gustave A. Krasen — is a well-preserved example of late Gothic Revival architecture and has significant history as a community gathering space. Leven said the nomination materials include an intensive survey, property records and photographs that support architectural significance and integrity.

Leven told the commission that, if designated locally, exterior alterations to the building would require review by the Historic Preservation Commission and the Plan Commission; interior changes are not subject to that review. Leven noted there are potential benefits to pursuing listing on state or national registers later, including possible tax credits, but he said there are no immediate automatic tax benefits solely from local designation.

The public hearing had no speakers. Commissioners who spoke during the item noted the owner, Michael Kennelly, has maintained the property and that designation would help preserve an architecturally significant local landmark. The commission moved to approve the designation and approved it by roll call; votes recorded as yes included Commissioners Mitchell, Meyer, Frederick, Bernardi, Caprillion, Council member O’Reilly and Mayor Teaschik.

Ending: The recommendation moves forward consistent with the city’s historic preservation ordinance; staff noted that a removal-from-register process exists, which would require review by the Plan Commission and Historic Preservation Commission.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee