The Lewisville Planning & Zoning Commission on Jan. 7 recorded four formal plat votes and tabled two public‑hearing items for further review.
Votes at a glance
- Louisville Corporate Center, Lot 2R, Block A (6.578 acres; replat of Louisville Corporate Center, Lot 2, Block A; Case No. 241211‑RP): Commissioners voted to disapprove the final plat due to a staff‑identified list of deficiencies and delegated authority to staff to accept and approve the plat once all deficiencies are corrected. Motion by Aram Ali; second by Ainsley. Vote: motion carries, 6‑0.
- Valley Ridge Industrial Park Addition, Lots 12, Block A (26.8417 acres; replat of Valley Ridge Business Park East Addition, Lots 3‑45, Block B; Case No. 241212‑RP): Commissioners voted to approve the final plat. Motion by Jack; second by Francesca. Vote: motion carries, 6‑0.
- TDH Stewart's Addition (Lots 14R1/14R2, Block B; 0.284 acres; Case No. 241213‑RP): Commissioners voted to disapprove the final plat due to staff‑listed deficiencies and delegated authority to staff to accept and approve the plat after deficiencies are corrected. Motion by Rick; second by Ainsley. Vote: motion carries, 6‑0.
- Special‑use permit for licensed massage therapy at 1010 Edmonds Lane (Lot 2, Block A, Lewisville Plaza Phase 2; Case No. 240916‑SUP): The applicant withdrew a prior hearing date and reapplied; staff recommended continuing the public hearing to Jan. 21, 2025 to obtain additional information from the Town of Flower Mound. The Commission opened and re‑opened the public hearing and then voted to table the item until Jan. 21, 2025. Motion by Jack; second by Francesca. Vote: motion carries, 6‑0.
Context and next steps: For the three plats disapproved the commission’s action delegated to staff the authority to accept and approve each final plat after identified deficiencies are corrected; those corrections and staff approval are administrative and do not require returning to the commission. The SUP application for massage therapy was opened for public comment and then tabled at staff’s request to allow the applicant and staff to provide additional materials at the Jan. 21 meeting.
Formal motions recorded in the meeting minutes match the outcomes above and were recorded 6‑0 in favor.