Superintendent Mike Genestri told the Sweet Home Central School District Board of Education on Tuesday that voters will see two propositions on the Dec. 16 ballot to address enrollment growth, end-of-life building systems and athletic facilities.
He described Proposition 1 as a $55,200,000 package that district officials say would be tax neutral for homeowners because it will use declining debt service and $3,000,000 from the district’s capital reserve. Proposition 1 would add 10 classrooms across three elementary schools — six at Maplemere, two at Heritage Heights and two at Glendale — and would also fund building-condition-survey items such as roofs, boilers, HVAC, fire alarms and access controls (the presentation specifically cited a roof replacement at the middle school and roof needs at Glendale).
Proposition 2, Genestri said, is a $35,300,000 optional package that would include classroom and corridor renovations at elementary schools, gymnasium upgrades at the four elementary schools, and athletic improvements at Sweet Home High School including turf replacement, lights, dugouts and a new ticket booth. The district’s presentation estimated a one-time tax impact of $64 per $250,000 of assessed home value if Proposition 2 passes.
Genestri and Don (staff member) discussed enrollment trends: the district reported 3,784 students across pre-K–12 in the fall snapshot cited during the presentation and noted an increase at the elementary level over recent years (pre-K–5 up to about 1,832 from 1,588 three years earlier). The district said it built the project scope from community input, including a thought-exchange survey and 14 in-person focus groups.
The presentation also addressed the district’s plan to convert its school bus fleet to electric vehicles. District staff said the service center currently supports three chargers for electric buses but that the existing electrical service cannot handle additional chargers. A roughly $1.3 million electrical-service upgrade for the service center is listed in the proposition; district staff said they expect some grant support for that work and described National Grid’s “Make Ready” program as a potential funding source. Staff said National Grid would cover a large share of the utility-side Make-Ready costs (National Grid representatives were cited as saying the utility might cover up to 90 percent of the work from the utility to the building) and that NYSERDA advocacy could help secure additional inside-building grant funding.
Genestri said the next steps include two public forums (Nov. 24 at 6:30 p.m. in the high school auditorium and Dec. 10 at 6:30 p.m. in the middle school auditorium) and a district mailing and video to inform voters. If approved and if state reviews proceed on a typical schedule, the presentation projected construction could begin in 2027.
Board members asked about alternates and bid strategies, playground accessibility, the timeline for state review and grant prospects for bus chargers. Genestri said bids will include alternates and that the district will pursue grant funding for the electrification work but cautioned that timing and amounts are not guaranteed. He asked custodial and maintenance staff to identify priority alternates that could be added if bids and funding allow.
No final vote on either proposition occurred that night; board members were presented with the draft resolutions and were told the public vote resolution and the SEQRA (environmental review) resolution would be on next week’s agenda for a formal board vote.