FSEC posts fourth‑quarter cost allocation percentages for review period starting April 1
April 19, 2025 | Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, Governor's Office - Boards & Commissions, Executive, Washington
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
Director Sonya Bumpus presented the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council’s fourth‑quarter cost allocation update covering April 1 through June 30, 2025.
Bumpus read the allocation percentages for listed facilities: Columbia Generating Station 20 percent; Horse Heaven 13 percent; Chehalis 6 percent; Grays Harbor 6 percent; Carriger Solar 5 percent; GoldenEye 5 percent; Hop Hill 5 percent; Wallula Gap 5 percent; Watoma 5 percent; Columbia Solar 4 percent; Oestria (referred to as Austria in packet) 4 percent; Desert Claim Wind 4 percent; Goose Prairie 4 percent; Kittitas Valley 4 percent; Wildhorse 4 percent; Badger Mountain 2 percent; High Top 2 percent; and WNP‑1 2 percent.
Bumpus concluded the update after reading the list and invited questions; no queries were raised.
Why it matters: Cost allocation percentages determine how FSEC spreads administrative and processing costs among active site certification projects for the quarter noted; applicants and partner agencies monitor these allocations for billing and budgeting.
Bumpus read the allocation percentages for listed facilities: Columbia Generating Station 20 percent; Horse Heaven 13 percent; Chehalis 6 percent; Grays Harbor 6 percent; Carriger Solar 5 percent; GoldenEye 5 percent; Hop Hill 5 percent; Wallula Gap 5 percent; Watoma 5 percent; Columbia Solar 4 percent; Oestria (referred to as Austria in packet) 4 percent; Desert Claim Wind 4 percent; Goose Prairie 4 percent; Kittitas Valley 4 percent; Wildhorse 4 percent; Badger Mountain 2 percent; High Top 2 percent; and WNP‑1 2 percent.
Bumpus concluded the update after reading the list and invited questions; no queries were raised.
Why it matters: Cost allocation percentages determine how FSEC spreads administrative and processing costs among active site certification projects for the quarter noted; applicants and partner agencies monitor these allocations for billing and budgeting.
Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!
Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.
✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
30-day money-back guarantee
