A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Commission approves indemnification addendum with Ajax for Nexus Center grant compliance, 4–1

October 06, 2025 | Flagler County, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission approves indemnification addendum with Ajax for Nexus Center grant compliance, 4–1
Flagler County commissioners voted 4–1 on Oct. 6 to approve Addendum No. 1 to the construction contract with Ajax Building Company for the Nexus Center, adding a county indemnity tied to grant requirements from the Florida Department of Commerce (the grant uses ARPA funds).

County Engineer Hamid Tabassian and staff explained that the Nexus Center construction contract predated the department’s $4 million grant. The Florida Department of Commerce required subcontractors to indemnify the department as a condition of the award; Ajax agreed to that requirement but requested the county provide a counter‑indemnity because the work and many subcontractor documents predated the grant conditions.

Tabassian said the county’s proposed indemnity is capped at $1.25 million and is limited to liabilities arising from the Commerce grant provisions. County staff told commissioners federal clauses such as Buy America, Davis‑Bacon wage rules and certain background‑check provisions were determined not to be applicable to this project, and the indemnity is meant as protection should a third party make a claim related to the grant’s specific provisions.

Commissioner Carney moved approval; Commissioner Richardson seconded. Commissioner Pennington recorded the sole “nay” on the 4–1 vote, expressing concern that the county could be on the hook for up to $1.25 million for compliance issues that he said should normally be the contractor’s responsibility and urging that future contracts anticipate grant conditions.

County staff said the alternative would be to forgo the $4 million grant reimbursement and leave the county to fund those construction costs. Tabassian and the county’s finance and legal teams said the addendum narrowly limits indemnity to the grant provisions and excludes unrelated contractor obligations.

Ending: The board approved the addendum with the indemnity cap; staff indicated they will review contracting practices for future projects to better align contract terms with potential grant conditions.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee