A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee approves psychology board fee-recovery measure despite objections over contested-case costs

May 30, 2025 | Ways and Means, Joint, Committees, Legislative, Oregon


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee approves psychology board fee-recovery measure despite objections over contested-case costs
The Education Subcommittee recommended Senate Bill 789 be reported out with a do‑pass recommendation. The bill would authorize the Oregon Board of Psychology to recover costs associated with successful disciplinary actions — including certain attorney and administrative costs — using a tiered fee structure for respondents who do not prevail in disciplinary proceedings.

Senator McLean challenged the proposal on grounds it could expose licensees to large contested‑case costs and deter individuals from exercising their right to a hearing. Committee staff told members the fiscal assumption estimated modest recoverable revenue: about $16,911 in other funds revenue under a 25% recovery assumption, but members noted contested-case costs cited elsewhere had ranged much higher. “If the individual wants to have an adversarial hearing…and if they’re found noncompliant…they have to pay the agencies $30,000 to $50,000,” McLean said, arguing that requirement chills due process.

Supporters said the measure aligns the psychology board with other professional licensing boards that have similar cost-recovery structures and that the tiered structure includes thresholds below which the board cannot recover fees. Legislative Fiscal Office staff explained the statute’s tier: no recovery under $3,000; recover 50% between $3,000 and $6,000; and higher recovery above $6,000 depending on the final language.

After extended discussion and a roll‑call process for objections, the committee reported SB 789 out as recommended. Members asked for broader legislative consideration of cost‑recovery policy across professional licensing bodies in future work.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee