A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Oklahoma County approves MOUs and contracts for pretrial services, opioid abatement and security; citizen raises drug-testing concern

July 02, 2025 | Oklahoma County, Oklahoma


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Oklahoma County approves MOUs and contracts for pretrial services, opioid abatement and security; citizen raises drug-testing concern
The Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners approved a bundle of contracts and memoranda of understanding covering pretrial release services, opioid abatement and security services, and a related contract for pretrial services.

County staff presented items 13–18 as a package. Among them were a memorandum of understanding with the district attorney to provide pretrial release services, a separate MOU with the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority for pretrial release services, and a contract with the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center for opioid abatement services with a not-to-exceed amount of $299,813.63. Staff said the opioid contract is contingent on encumbrance of funds and that billing will be on a monthly reimbursement basis pending the county’s final deposit from the attorney general for June.

The board also approved a contract for security services with ProSecure, described by staff as split 70/30 between the Board of County Commissioners and the PBA; county’s 30 percent share was listed at $96,852.52. A separate contract with TEAM for pretrial release services was among the items approved.

During the public comment period on item 17, resident Jed Green raised a concern about the TEAM contract’s drug-testing language. Green said the contract text treats a positive drug test for a substance other than a prescribed medication the same as a prescription, but noted that “licensed medical marijuana cardholders do not have a prescription. They have a recommendation.” He cited “Oklahoma statute, title 63 4 27 10” as the authority for the distinction.

The board voted to approve the slate of items after a motion and second. Staff framed the opioid contract as contingent on receipt and encumbrance of the remaining funds from the attorney general before full performance would proceed.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee