The City Planning and Zoning Commission voted to forward Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2025047, allowing a used automobile sales operation at 334 Dahlonega Street on Highway 9, to the City Council with an added condition limiting display and requiring single-space parking behind gates.
The applicant’s attorney, Planning Commissioner Sean Courtney of Lipscomb Johnson, told the commission the site is about 1.34 acres, has been vacant and formerly hosted landscaping and other businesses, and that the applicant seeks to establish automobile sales and brokerage there. “We’ve agreed, that there will be only 11 cars that can be displayed along the frontage,” Courtney said, adding the lot will have gates and screening so “the cars will each be in a space.” He also said, “We’ve agreed to do a 5 foot landscape strip.”
Scott, a city planning staff member, said the property is in a Highway Business zoning district where used-car sales are conditionally allowed and that the future land-use designation is general commercial. “Based upon the submitted conditions, the exhibits, including the site plan provided, the staff recommends approval of the CUP as presented,” Scott said.
A motion from the commission included an added condition (identified in the meeting as condition 13) clarifying that all parking behind the gated area must be single-space parking so vehicles are not double-stacked and access lanes remain passable. The motion was seconded and recorded as unanimous.
The applicant also offered visuals and a building renovation plan showing added planting and screening, and the site plan submitted with the application restricts car displays to marked spaces and adds landscaped islands. The staff report said off-street parking and loading are adequate and that the proposed use conforms with the city’s comprehensive-plan objectives for general commercial areas.
The commission’s action sends the CUP, with the additional parking condition and landscaping requirement, to the City Council for final consideration. No public speakers opposed or supported the application during the hearing.
A copy of the site plan and the applicant’s renderings were included in the meeting packet and are expected to accompany the item to the council.