The Biloxi City Council on an undated meeting delayed action on a proposal to require a six-foot chain-link perimeter fence and other security measures at a methadone clinic, voting to table the item for one week so staff can meet with clinic operators and planning and police officials.
Neighbors and several council members raised concerns about activity near the clinic during public comment and the council’s policy discussion. Jared Foster, a resident of 425 Cove Drive, told the council the matter raised due-process questions about how hearings were handled and quoted a U.S. Supreme Court precedent, saying in part that “not only is a biased decision maker constitutionally inaccessible.”
Councilmembers and staff said past investigations found no code or licensing violations at the clinic’s site. The council discussion referenced statements by Community Development Director Creel and Biloxi Police Chief Miller, whom council members said reported finding no violations and few or no police complaints tied directly to the clinic’s operation since its opening in 2016. One councilmember told the council that the clinic has served “over 2,500” clients historically and “presently, they have 400 that they’re working with,” remarks the council attributed to prior staff summaries.
During debate, Councilmember Lawrence proposed an amendment that would require a six-foot chain-link fence around the clinic property, excluding a wooded area behind the building. “How about this? We we say a 6-foot perimeter fence that will surround the property,” Councilmember Lawrence said. Councilmembers and staff pressed for clearer parameters—location, gate type and duration—before adopting a binding requirement.
After further discussion about specifics and enforceability, the amendment was withdrawn and the council voted to table the entire item for one week. Councilmember Gonyell moved to table and Councilmember Lawrence seconded; the chair called for a voice vote and said, “Motion carries. Table for 1 week.” The council directed staff to meet with the clinic and planning staff to develop clear, implementable security options and return with recommendations at the next meeting.
Council remarks stressed balancing neighbors’ concerns about local activity and perception with the clinic’s role in providing services. Several council members urged that any security requirements be drawn with input from planning and engineering staff so the measures are practical and enforceable.
The item is scheduled to return to the council after staff and planning commission review and a meeting with clinic representatives.