The Monmouth City Council adopted legislative amendment 25-01 on June 17, approving an Economic Opportunity Analysis (EOA) and related amendments to the zoning code and comprehensive plan by a 6-0 roll call.
The EOA forecasts about 1,460 new jobs in Monmouth by the end of the planning period (2044) and, according to staff, concluded the city will need roughly 50 acres of commercial land and 29 acres of industrial land to accommodate anticipated demand. "We needed 50 acres of commercial land, 29 more acres of industrial land," said Suzanne Deppner, community economic development director for the City of Monmouth, summarizing the analysis.
The staff presentation and packet explain the city’s buildable land inventory shows a shortfall of roughly 45 acres of commercial land and a nominal surplus of 14 acres of industrial land. City consultants and staff warned that the industrial surplus is concentrated in smaller parcels that may not meet typical industrial users’ parcel‑size needs.
The amendment package adds a distinct "data center" use to the code, introduces building‑orientation standards for the commercial retail zone (to encourage entrances facing the street on East Main) and sets more quantitative, objective standards for industrial development — including numeric guidance on light and sound — so development reviews are less discretionary.
The planning commission reviewed the EOA and recommended adoption with a small amendment to the data‑center definition noting water and power demands. Staff said the EOA includes 21 implementation strategies across five categories — land needs, policy/code changes, business support, small‑business strategies and workforce initiatives — and that full explanation of the strategies appears in the packet (pages 60–63).
Councilors asked how the EOA would be balanced with the city’s housing needs analysis and upcoming transportation plan; staff said the timing presents an opportunity to reconcile residential, commercial and industrial needs comprehensively and that implementation will proceed via planning‑commission work sessions and follow‑up items brought back to council. At the close of deliberation Councilor Kerrey moved adoption; the motion passed on a roll call vote reported as 6-0.
The council directed staff to bring back ordinance language to implement the code changes and attachments included in the motion for final adoption.