A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Council adds new application fees for state‑required housing adjustments and emergency shelter siting

June 17, 2025 | Monmouth City, Polk County, Oregon


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council adds new application fees for state‑required housing adjustments and emergency shelter siting
The Monmouth City Council adopted Resolution No. 20-17 on June 17 to add two new land‑use application fee categories and set fees: a housing adjustment application (authorized by Senate Bill 1537) at $337 and an emergency shelter siting application (House Bill 3395) at $730.

Suzanne Deppner, community economic development director, explained the housing adjustment application is intended to allow limited deviations from quantifiable code standards that may impede housing production under the state statute; staff proposed the $337 fee because the workload is similar to the city’s existing minor variance/adjustment process. "We're proposing that [$337] for a housing adjustment… because the housing adjustment seemed to most closely align with the workload with the minor adjustment," Deppner said.

For emergency shelter siting the staff proposal set a $730 fee, basing that level on the city’s fee for design review of buildings under 15,000 square feet; staff noted the first such application processed locally took more time than a typical case and that the proposed fee is a reasonable estimate to recover a portion of staff effort.

Councilor McKeel asked whether applicants who could not afford the fee could request a waiver; staff said the city’s ordinance allows exemptions or council‑level consideration of fee waivers on a case‑by‑case basis, and applicants could request waiver or reduced payment through the council process. Councilor McKeel moved adoption of the resolution; the motion carried on roll call and the resolution was adopted.

Staff said the new fees will be adjusted annually by a cost‑of‑living index and that staff conducted an internal workload‑based estimate rather than a comprehensive cross‑jurisdictional fee survey.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee