A judge agreed to the state’s proposed disposition for David Saldivar’s motion to revoke community supervision: the state would withdraw its motion, the court would extend supervision for two years, and while Saldivar remains in custody he would be referred to felony drug court; if felony drug court did not accept him he would be sent to an ISF (inpatient stabilization facility). The court also ordered partial GPS for employment and no in-person contact and no residence with certain family members named on the record (David, Elizabeth and Angela Aguilar).
Prosecutors and defense counsel described Saldivar’s history, discussed mental-health and anxiety concerns and the suitability of felony drug court versus ISF. Probation and the state emphasized the goal of treatment; defense and family members echoed a desire for treatment and assistance locating housing. The court explained that participation in felony drug court could include tailoring services for dual diagnosis if accepted; it noted that ISF placement is a different program and might not address mental-health needs in the same way.
The court placed conditions on any release or supervision change: an extension of two years, GPS for employment purposes upon release, waiving certain fees, and a no-contact/no-residence order with specific family members. The judge told counsel that once defendant stabilized, counsel could request reconsideration of the no-contact order. The record references an alternate plan to void the revocation motion if the agreed conditions were implemented and if the drug-court referral proceeded.