Judge revokes Dalen Newman on one case, continues another to ISF after family-witness testimony
July 31, 2025 | Judge Stephanie Boyd 187th District, District Court Judges, Judicial, Texas
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
A Bexar County judge on Aug. 1 revoked community supervision and sentenced Dalen Newman to 365 days in county jail on one case, while on a separate case the judge continued supervision and ordered in-custody intervention (ISF) and treatment-focused conditions.
During the hearing, a witness and mother, Lisa Newman, told the court she had asked her son to follow household rules and seek employment; she described family support but said he had not complied with certain expectations. After hearing from the witness and counsel, the court revoked Newman in cause number 2025CR001217W, imposed a 365-day county-jail sentence and entered an affirmative family-violence finding. The judge explained limited appeal rights tied to the motion allegations and reiterated the weapons-possession prohibition after a family-violence finding.
On a separate pending case, 2024CR012811, the court offered Newman a choice between revocation with a two-year prison exposure or continued supervision through an in-custody Intensive Services Facility (ISF). Newman elected ISF. The court then denied the state's motion to revoke on that cause and amended conditions to include a TAP evaluation in custody, follow TAP recommendations, and place Newman on ISF probation.
The clerk noted a restitution amount of $629.99 to Academy on the record for one cause; the court asked the probation office to follow up about restitution amounts and implementation. The judge told Newman the options and consequences carefully, and the defendant chose ISF over a prison sentence.
Court staff will implement TAP, ISF placement and restitution follow-ups per probation directions; the judge set related monitoring and reporting requirements.
During the hearing, a witness and mother, Lisa Newman, told the court she had asked her son to follow household rules and seek employment; she described family support but said he had not complied with certain expectations. After hearing from the witness and counsel, the court revoked Newman in cause number 2025CR001217W, imposed a 365-day county-jail sentence and entered an affirmative family-violence finding. The judge explained limited appeal rights tied to the motion allegations and reiterated the weapons-possession prohibition after a family-violence finding.
On a separate pending case, 2024CR012811, the court offered Newman a choice between revocation with a two-year prison exposure or continued supervision through an in-custody Intensive Services Facility (ISF). Newman elected ISF. The court then denied the state's motion to revoke on that cause and amended conditions to include a TAP evaluation in custody, follow TAP recommendations, and place Newman on ISF probation.
The clerk noted a restitution amount of $629.99 to Academy on the record for one cause; the court asked the probation office to follow up about restitution amounts and implementation. The judge told Newman the options and consequences carefully, and the defendant chose ISF over a prison sentence.
Court staff will implement TAP, ISF placement and restitution follow-ups per probation directions; the judge set related monitoring and reporting requirements.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
