Councilmembers met June 17 in a technical review meeting to prepare the agenda for the next regular City Council meeting and to clarify the meeting’s permitted scope.
“The purpose of technical review meeting shall be to establish the business to be heard for only the next relevant regular city council meeting,” a councilmember said, reading language from the city charter and city code. “There shall not be any discussion that would constitute deliberations or establishment of a consensus of opinion on any agenda items.”
The councilmember proposing a change said the tech review agenda should front-load only a few items: public comment, proposed additions to the next regular meeting agenda, and any further clarifying items staff or petitioners need to address. That format, the councilmember said, would “speed things up” by making clear the meeting is “a meeting about a meeting,” not a forum for item-by-item public comment or substantive debate.
Councilmembers and staff discussed the roles of supporting documents and when public comment should occur. The proposing councilmember said the supporting materials for each agenda item would remain publicly available but that tech review “isn’t a time to discuss” each item in depth.
Several councilmembers noted caution about turning the session into a deliberative forum. One councilmember said the council may still vote, under the charter, to add an item to the regular meeting by majority vote, but stressed the intent of the work session as procedural.
The discussion concluded with staff and council acknowledging they would circulate a revised draft agenda format for future technical review meetings. No formal policy change was adopted at the June 17 session; the proposal will appear in future agendas for consideration.