Currituck County commissioners on Sept. 2 approved a text amendment to the Unified Development Ordinance that removes the special-use-permit requirement for type 1 preliminary plats creating 20 or fewer lots and shifts those applications to administrative review by the county’s technical review committee when they meet the ordinance requirements.
The change, PB 25-15, was adopted with staff’s recommended “option 2,” which counts minor splits within five years of creation and counts major subdivision lots created from the same parent parcel within the previous 10 years when determining whether an application is a type 1 (administrative) or type 2 (quasi‑judicial) preliminary plat. The board’s motion to approve the amendment with staff option 2 and the planning board’s supporting finding (item 5) carried unanimously.
The amendment strikes the special-use-permit trigger that previously required an evidentiary hearing when one or more public facilities were at 85% or more of maximum capacity for plats creating 20 or fewer lots. Miss Turner, planning staff, told commissioners that the proposed definition of “parent parcel” references the county’s first unified development ordinance date, 04/02/1989, and staff offered three options. Option 1 would align the ordinance with historical implementation; option 2 adds the 10-year reset for major subdivision lots; option 3 would treat any plat of 20 or fewer lots as a type 1 regardless of parent-parcel history. Turner said option 2 was intended to prevent minor, short-term piecemeal filings from requiring a special-use hearing while still capturing phases of a larger development that are proposed within 10 years of the original major subdivision approval.
Turner also presented Tishler study generation rates used to estimate school impacts from new lots; she noted the county’s analysis shows, for example, that a maximum student generation from a 20-lot subdivision under those rates is small (staff indicated a typical maximum figure of about eight students for a 20-lot scenario per the Tishler factors). The planning board recommended approval of staff option 2 and found the request consistent with the Imagine Currituck 2040 vision plan and UDO land use and infrastructure goals.
The ordinance change does not alter technical standards — stormwater, road, or other development requirements remain the same — but moves the procedural review for qualifying small preliminary plats from a board special-use hearing to administrative Technical Review Committee approval if the criteria are met. Commissioners asked staff to continue sending the monthly application digest so the board can track administratively approved plats.
The amendment adds a written parent-parcel definition (parcel as it existed on 04/02/1989) and clarifies how minor splits created within five years are counted against a parent parcel. The board adopted the amendment after a unanimous vote; the motion and second were recorded during the Sept. 2 meeting and the clerk announced “motion carries.”
Looking ahead, staff will administratively review qualifying type 1 preliminary plats; the board will continue to hear type 2 plats and any matters that still require quasi‑judicial proceedings.