A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Office owner challenges Clay County assessment amid long‑term vacancy and a June 2023 refinance appraisal

August 21, 2025 | Clay County, Missouri


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Office owner challenges Clay County assessment amid long‑term vacancy and a June 2023 refinance appraisal
A representative for the Briarcliff Office (Building 1, part of a five‑building office portfolio) asked Clay County to lower the assessment for a single building citing prolonged vacancy, tenant improvement costs and market weakness for class‑B office space.

The owner representative said the building has suffered long‑term vacancy since 2019 (citing suites vacant on multiple floors) and estimated a significant two‑year rent loss and tenant improvement allowance that together lowered the building's value. He said recent rents achieved on occupied suites were about $28.29 per square foot but that many older leases were well below market. Using a loaded overall rate of about 11.2% after applying the tax load, he concluded a value near $7.0–$7.4 million for the subject building.

Mike Jacoby for the county said the property owner refinanced the five‑building portfolio in June 2023 and that the refinance appraisal (which the owner declined to provide to the assessor) shows a portfolio value the county interprets as about $12.0 million for the building in question. Jacoby told the board the county's valuation incorporated the appraisal and other market data and that without seeing the owner's refinance appraisal the county could not accept the lower number.

The hearing included detailed back‑and‑forth about how to calculate rent loss (subtracting a standard 9% market vacancy from observed vacancy to compute incremental rent loss), the proper vacancy and TI assumptions for an office property, and whether office market obsolescence justified an additional rent‑loss adjustment. The county asked the owner to supply the refinance appraisal; the owner said the lender appraisal was confidential and the owner had not provided it to the assessor. The assessor said the county must see the appraisal to verify the claimed lower value.

The board told the parties it would review any appraisals or supporting financials and issue a written decision.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee