A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Senate expands felony penalties for endangering children, elderly and disabled by fentanyl (House Bill 166)

May 09, 2025 | Senate, Legislative, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate expands felony penalties for endangering children, elderly and disabled by fentanyl (House Bill 166)
Senator Hancock presented and the Senate passed House Bill 166, which expands the substances covered by the statute that criminalizes endangering a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual by exposing them to certain controlled substances.

Under existing law, exposing a vulnerable person to methamphetamine in a way that places them in imminent danger can be a state jail felony. House Bill 166 adds fentanyl and related opioids to the penalty group applicable to the offense, bringing them into the penalty group 1B category that already covers fentanyl and similar substances.

"With this, we strengthen protections to children, elderly individuals, and disabled individuals by expanding the substances listed in the penal code that endangered these vulnerable populations," Senator Hancock said on the floor. Sponsors said the change increases penalties in cases where fentanyl exposure places a vulnerable person at imminent risk of death, bodily injury or mental impairment.

The Senate passed the bill on third reading and final passage after suspending rules; the roll call shows final passage with 30 ayes and 1 nay. The bill's caption, as read on the floor, addresses the criminal offense of endangering a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual by engaging in conduct involving a controlled substance.

If enacted, the statute will treat certain fentanyl-related conduct that endangers vulnerable people under the more severe penalty grouping identified in statute; the transcript did not specify retroactivity, sentencing ranges or required changes to charging practices by prosecutors.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee