A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Commissioners debate raising residential fence height and rules for combined walls

August 15, 2025 | Newberg, Yamhill County, Oregon


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commissioners debate raising residential fence height and rules for combined walls
City planning staff proposed increasing the allowed height of fences in residential interior yards to 7 feet and adding clearer rules to measure combined fence-plus-retaining-wall heights, including counting berms in height calculations. The proposal is part of a code maintenance package the commission will take to a public hearing on Sept. 11.
Under the draft language, front-yard fences would remain limited to 4 feet; interior-yard fences could be up to 7 feet. For locations where a fence sits on or near a retaining wall the draft would treat the fence and wall as a combined structure and set a total combined height cap (staff discussed 8 feet in examples), and would include berms in height measurements to prevent circumvention by mounding soil. A city staff member explained that “any fence that's over 7 feet in height…requires a building permit,” and that building-permit review checks footings and structural integrity.
Commissioners raised several concerns. Some said a 7-foot limit is reasonable but questioned inconsistency where a combined wall/fence provision would allow 8 feet in some cases while the general residential fence maximum would be 7 feet. Commissioners also objected to a draft rule that would force fences to be set back 5 feet from retaining walls located within 10 feet of the street; those members argued that requirement could create narrow, unusable strips of land and complicate existing lots. Commissioner Matthew Mansfield advocated removing the 5-foot setback clause; several commissioners indicated staff should return with clarified, consistent text and rationale. Staff said they would refine language and include the revised proposal in the public hearing draft.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee