A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Kokomo council approves four rezoning petitions, including church parking lot and medical-office site

September 30, 2025 | Kokomo City, Howard County, Indiana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Kokomo council approves four rezoning petitions, including church parking lot and medical-office site
The Kokomo Common Council approved four rezoning petitions during the meeting by suspending rules and passing each ordinance on first and second reading.

Ordinance 72-13 approved a petition by Radiant Life Ministry Inc. to rezone 2418 North Calumet Street from R-4 (urban residential) to IS (institutional) to use the parcel as a church parking lot. Councilman Grieco moved suspension of the rules and then moved for passage on second reading; the council voted in favor.

Ordinance 72-14 approved a petition from Lindsay Marie Fisher to reclassify property at 2110 West Alto Road from OC (office commercial) to AR (agricultural/rural residential). The council suspended the rules and carried the ordinance on second reading.

Ordinance 72-15 approved a petition by JPO Realty LLC and Millennium Trust Company to rezone the former Meadowbloom Dairy on West Sycamore from AR (agricultural/residential) to OC (office commercial) for planned medical-office use. The council suspended the rules and passed the ordinance on second reading.

Ordinance 72-16 approved a petition by Charles and Mayaka Dunlap to change 1105 East Markland Avenue from C-1 (commercial) to R-5 (urban residential), returning a property used for commercial purposes in recent years back to private residential use; the council suspended rules and passed the ordinance on second reading.

Each of these items was presented with motions to suspend the usual rules for immediate consideration; the motions were seconded and the council voted to pass the ordinances. No extended public testimony or contested roll-call votes on these items were recorded in the meeting transcript.

The council did not record substantial debate on the rezones in the public transcript; council members processed the petitions, moved suspension of rules and approved each item in sequence.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee