Project to Replace Defective Home with New Structure and ADU Sparks Neighborhood Debate

The San Francisco Planning Commission convened on July 15, 2021, to discuss a proposed residential project at 35 Belgrave Avenue, which involves the demolition of a defectively constructed home and its replacement with a new single-family residence and an accessory dwelling unit (ADU). The meeting featured presentations from city staff and project sponsors, followed by public comments from local residents.

City staff reported receiving 15 correspondences from 23 community members regarding the project. Of these, seven expressed support, citing the project's compatibility with the neighborhood's design and scale, as well as the need to fully develop the site after years of delays. Supporters also noted that similar projects had previously been approved in the area. Conversely, seven correspondences indicated opposition, primarily due to concerns about ongoing construction fatigue, environmental impacts, noise, and the proposed building's modern design, which some felt clashed with the character of existing homes.

The existing structure is deemed unsafe and unfinished, with multiple construction-related issues. The proposed project aims to create two dwelling units, exceeding the permitted density for the zoning district, but without displacing any rent-controlled units, as single-family homes are not subject to such regulations. City staff concluded that the project aligns with the general plan and recommended approval with conditions.

Project sponsor Scott Emblidge emphasized that the new design would fit well within the context of the block, which features larger homes. He noted that the proposed residence would be smaller in footprint than the existing house and would include a significant portion of below-grade space to minimize visual impact. Emblidge also highlighted the project's potential to resolve neighborhood issues by replacing an uninhabited structure that has been problematic since its last renovation in 2013.

Public comments reflected a mix of support and opposition. Some residents voiced concerns about the project's impact on neighborhood affordability and character, arguing that it would contribute to a trend of oversized homes that overshadow smaller, existing residences. Others supported the project, praising its thoughtful design and the sponsors' outreach efforts.

The commission concluded the meeting by inviting further discussion and deliberation on the project, with a focus on balancing community concerns with the need for new housing development in San Francisco. The outcome of the commission's decision remains pending, as they consider the diverse perspectives shared during the public comment period.